Milfaholic review

The present data reveal zero high matchmaking between Conscientiousness and you may narcissism (Miller et al

The present data reveal zero high matchmaking between Conscientiousness and you may narcissism (Miller et al


There have been 437 (270 people) users, who had been recruited through in public obtainable websites. Their indicate age are 23 ages (SD = 5.96). Participants were requested to accomplish some questionnaires the which aren’t associated for the most recent research. All victims gave the advised consent towards release of the try ratings getting research motives, and all was given views to the standard result of the analysis. The newest dataset analysed when you look at the latest investigation is available within


Vulnerable narcissism is actually mentioned into the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale of the Hendin and Cheek (1997) about Gloss interpretation (pick Czarna mais aussi al. 2014). It includes ten affairs with good Likert-eg reaction measure from just one (strongly disagree) so you’re able to 5 (highly consent).

Grandiose narcissism is examined into confirmed Polish variation (Bazinska and you can Drat-Ruszczak 2000) of your Narcissistic Personality Index (Raskin and you may Hall 1979). Those things was selected basing with the factor study (loadings exceeding .40) and you may illustrated next subscales of one’s NPI: Expert (11 issues), Self-Sufficiency (7), Mirror (5), and Exhibitionism (11). Participants rated their amount of approval of each and every report having fun with a beneficial Likert-method of response style, from (cannot apply at myself) so you can 5 (relates to me personally). The sum circumstances creates a directory regarding grandiose narcissism. This has been shown recently the Likert format NPI manifests equivalent construct legitimacy and you can a little increased accuracy to the completely new pushed-solutions style (Miller mais aussi al. 2018a).

The major Five try examined that have Shine version (Strus mais aussi al. 2014) of your own Internationally Character Product Pool – Huge Four Aspect Scale (BFAS; DeYoung mais aussi al. 2007). It is a 100-items way of measuring feature domain names (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and you will Openness/Intellect) and also the several down-buy areas of for each domain name (Volatility, Detachment, Compassion, Politeness, Industriousness, Orderliness, Love, Assertiveness, Intelligence, and you may Transparency). Users are questioned to rate how much cash the latest comments is actually associated in it towards a good Likert-sort of level, from 1 (highly differ) so you’re able to 5 (firmly concur).

Overall performance

Very first, i examined the correlations anywhere between two variants from narcissism and you will identity faculties and domain names and you can points (Dining table step one). One another kind of narcissism coordinated with personality traits inside the a comparable solution to past research (age.grams. Miller mais aussi al. 2011). Especially, insecure narcissism try surely coordinated which have Neuroticism, and negatively with the Agreeableness and you will Extraversion. Grandiose narcissism correlated definitely that have Extraversion, Openness/Intellect and you may Conscientiousness, and adversely having Neuroticism and you can Agreeableness.

Subsequently, we compared the associations between each type of narcissism and aspects of personality within each domain. Therefore, we tested for the difference between two dependent correlations (Steiger 1980). Figure 1 illustrates graphically the patterns of correlations. We found that vulnerable narcissism was significantly and positively correlated with both aspects of Neuroticism and that correlations did not differ from one another (z =,215, p = 0.820), which supported H1. In addition, consistent with H2, grandiose narcissism was significantly and negatively correlated with Withdrawal, and this correlation was stronger than with Volatility (z = 5.85, p < 0.001). Grandiose narcissism correlated positively with both aspects of Extraversion; however, the association was stronger for Assertiveness (z = , p < 0.001), which supported H3. Vulnerable narcissism was equally negatively related to both Assertiveness and Enthusiasm (z = ?1.90; p = 0.060; H4). The results also supported H5; grandiose narcissism was negatively correlated with both aspects of Agreeableness. However, the correlation with Politeness was significantly stronger (z = 6.26; p < 0.001). The correlation of vulnerable narcissism with both aspects of Agreeableness was negative and the magnitudes of these correlations were similar (z = .261; p = 0.79). Thus, H6 was only partially supported, because we expected a higher association with Compassion. Finally, H7 was also supported: grandiose narcissism correlated positively with Intellect and this association was stronger than with Openness (z = 7.40; p < 0.001).